NON-AFRICAN PROSE: INVISIBLE MAN (Ralph Ellison)
How does the advice of the narrator's grandfather influence his actions?
In Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, the deathbed advice of the narrator’s grandfather serves as the novel’s central psychological anchor and a recurring source of internal conflict. His cryptic counsel—to "overcome 'em with yeses, undermine 'em with grins, agree 'em to death and destruction"—haunts the narrator, influencing his actions through a cycle of confusion, obedience, and eventual enlightenment.
From the outset, the grandfather’s words create a sense of deep-seated guilt in the narrator. Because the grandfather describes himself as a "traitor" and a "spy" for simply being a "meek" Black man in a white-dominated society, the narrator begins to fear that his own successes are actually acts of treachery. When the narrator receives praise from white leaders—such as after his speech at the Battle Royal—he feels a stinging sense of irony. His actions are initially guided by a desire to be the "good, subservient Black man," yet he constantly worries that he is inadvertently following his grandfather’s advice to "agree 'em to death."
During his time at the college and his early days in New York, the narrator adopts a policy of extreme politeness and "yes-ing." He believes that by being the most diligent, agreeable, and accomplished student, he can rise within the existing social structure. This is a direct, though perhaps misunderstood, application of the grandfather’s advice. He treats subservience as a strategic tool for advancement, only to realise later that this "yes-ing" did not undermine the white establishment but rather allowed figures like Dr Bledsoe and Mr Norton to use him as a puppet.
The narrator’s actions are further influenced when he encounters Dr Bledsoe, who has mastered the grandfather's advice in its most cynical form. Bledsoe admits to telling white people what they want to hear while secretly wielding power. This encounter forces the narrator to re-evaluate his grandfather’s words. He realises that "yes-ing" can be a form of mask-wearing, but he struggles with the moral cost of such a life. This realisation influences his later decision to join the Brotherhood, where he again attempts to work within a system, hoping to "undermine" it from the inside.
The ultimate influence of the advice is seen in the narrator’s final retreat to his underground hole. By the end of the novel, he understands that the "destruction" his grandfather spoke of wasn't necessarily a violent revolution, but the destruction of the "inner eyes" of those who refuse to see him. His actions in the finale—burning his identities and living in a room lit by 1,369 lightbulbs—represent a final "yes" to his own invisibility. He accepts that the only way to "agree 'em to death" is to exist outside their definitions entirely.
The grandfather’s advice is the lens through which the narrator views every interaction with authority. It initially paralyses him with doubt, then drives him toward a false sense of security through subservience, and finally leads him to the realisation that the "mask" of the "yes-man" is a burden he must shed to find his true self. The grandfather’s words don't just influence the narrator's actions; they define the trajectory of his entire search for identity.
Contributions ({{ comment_count }})
Please wait...
Modal title
Report
Block User
{{ feedback_modal_data.title }}