Written constitutions are generally considered rigid because they require a special, difficult, legal process to be amended, unlike ordinary laws.
While it is common for written constitutions to be rigid, they can occasionally be flexible. For example, New Zealand has a written constitution (composed of various statutes like the Constitution Act 1986) that is considered flexible because it can be amended by a simple majority vote in Parliament, much like ordinary legislation.
There is an explanation video available below.
Contributions ({{ comment_count }})
Please wait...
Modal title
Report
Block User
{{ feedback_modal_data.title }}