In a democratic system _______
Majority Vote
Legal Sovereignty shouldn't be unquestionable
Electoral college is always necessary
Minority vote but majority rule
Explanation
Video Explanation
Post your Contribution
Discussions (13)
do you actually know the implementation of the option you choose...what it literally mean is that legal sovereignty should be questionable....Am so ashamed of you guys unprofessionalism...so so ashamed
"Majority vote" is not what happens in a democratic system. What happens is that "majority rule".
"All" qualified adults are allowed to vote in a democratic system, but it is the choice of the majority that is adhered to. If option A was "majority rule", it would have been the answer.
The answer to this question is B. Legal sovereignty shouldn't be unquestionable. The authority of the law or governing body (such as the state or government) is not immune to criticism or challenge in a democratic system. The authority should be subject to review, debate and potential reform. This helps to ensure checks and balances, prevent the abuse of power by the state or government, ensure that human rights are respected and that the principles of democracy are upheld.
In a democracy, Legal sovereignty should not be unquestionable. If Legal sovereignty is unquestionable, then there is a dictatorship. There is no misinterpretation here.
Legal sovereignty is the authority within a state that has the final and absolute power to make and enforce laws, as defined and recognised by the constitution. This includes all officials who are elected into power by the people.
In a democracy, these officials are not immune to being questioned. When the citizens feel that they are overreaching, they have every right to question the laws and policies made by these officials. This is why in a democratic system, legal sovereignty is not unquestionable.
