In a democracy,a major set back in the judicial process is
political neutrality
lack of professionalism
freedom from punishment
inadequate material resources
Explanation
Video Explanation
No video available
Post your Contribution
Discussions (16)
Political neutrality is definitely not the right ans to this qus. The right and must be B bcos lack of professionalism prevents one from performing his/her duties adequately.
The answer is absolutely wrong, only the civil servants possess political neutrality, in my own sense lack of professionalism is the most relevant answer.
@Myschool, pls reply with explicable reasons for ur answer.
B. Lack of professionalism.
While all the options listed could potentially be challenges in a democracy's judicial process, lack of professionalism within the judiciary can undermine the integrity, fairness, and effectiveness of the legal system. Professionalism encompasses factors such as competency, adherence to ethical standards, impartiality, and dedication to upholding the rule of law. When there's a lack of professionalism among judges, lawyers, and court personnel, it can lead to miscarriages of justice, erosion of public trust in the legal system, and hindered access to justice for citizens. Therefore, ensuring a high level of professionalism within the judiciary is crucial for maintaining the integrity and credibility of the legal process in a democratic society.
O would rather go for D, inadequate material resources — like security of Judiciary. Except that option A is Political interference
