Share:
Comment (36)
Post your comment
walai. Taa!fg sack!sack! Even if it wil waste tym 4 replace dm no prob.dy hv takn mre dan they cn chew.
of course they are supposed to let it known to asuu officially na. fg sef dey drag dis tin . d case is settled let dem just close it
Asuu I still support u... U are not f**ls. We need standard education not moi moi and bread education. Imagine a NYSC member not able to write an application letter. FG pls be real and just sign this tin...na just common signature o...na wa o...
Watin dey do this fagee or dag self! I know what you want and the mumu asuu members from south never even won use their brains to see say this strike na to set goodluck up make pipo hate our south man so that we go affect his political status, them no won still understand say northerners dey pay am for the good job of using the strike to campaign for them against 2015 election, but e no go work for u i swear.
Nw i no dat fag of a man is realy mad, he wut 2 b sentence 4 lif 4 dis assu strike, is he d first 2 b assu president y is he takin dis issue personal? Is he nw stronger dan d fg? Who dos he tink he is, dat man need 2 b cal 2 order he is stepin his bornd, was he employ by d fg? Or his he sayin nw dat he d fg ar his workers, he said dere ar free 2 asociate wit any political party yes u ar free bt most u drag assu into it, or do u tink assu is a political party? If u hav any personal prob wit gudluck must u bring assu into it, dis time 4 d fg 2 show assu dat dere ar boss, asuu is realy bitin more dan dere can chew, al lecurers dat did nt compli wit d fg shuld be sack startin wit dere president
During the Nov 4 meeting a non-victimisation clause wasn't include which comprises of Right for lecturers to strike without being victimised. If the clause was included Fg will have no reason to strengthen ASUU. So because it isn't in the MOU during the Nov 4 meeting, FG got every right to victimise them. However, if any Gov will victimise them it isn't GEJ's tenure. He has shown and given ASUU all its demand. ASUU is just being arrogant. Meanwhile, if the victimisation clause was included and ASUU had a bad aim on going on strike, they will use the inclusion as an evidence preventing FG from openning sch and threatening them cos the non-victimisation clauses has given them a right to strike and they have Gov't in their finger tips. Now their feathers are cut off and they don't want to call off in disgrace they ask for due protocols in following the process claiming not to be f**ls and knowing a system more. If they did they would have remembered to add the non-victimisation clause during the meeting and not wait until after 3weeks before bringing it as a condition for suspending the strike, isn't that a new demand! An agreement that was reached as a result of forgetfulness has no right to be included again. ASUU can use the non-victimisation clause to fight back even when the 200bn has been paid, by then FG will have no power over them again. ASUU lawyers should advice them on how to interpret laws. ASUU if u like don't call off. Any lecturer that resumes on Monday will be paid his or her salary arrears. Who don't want to celebrate Xmas should stay at home cos Fg won't pay anybody that didn't work.
During the Nov 4 meeting a non-victimisation clause
wasn't included which comprises of Right for lecturers to
strike without being victimised I think because ASUU forgot to raise it up. Perhaps they were enjoying the good treats FG offered to them but FG/ASUU came to a truce but forgot the non-victimisation clause to be included in an MOU which was agreed. If the clause was included FG
will have no reason to threaten ASUU. So because it isn't in
the MOU during the Nov 4 meeting, FG got every right to
victimise them because the industrial court will work with evidence. Law has to do with concrete evidence to vindicate a case. However, if any Gov will victimise them it
isn't GEJ's tenure. He has shown and given ASUU all its
demand. ASUU is just being arrogant. Now ASUU is requesting for the inclusion of the non-victimisation clause. Meanwhile, if the
non-victimisation clause was included and ASUU had a bad aim
on going on strike, they will use the inclusion as an evidence
preventing FG from opening sch and they will be postponing their meeting; NEC, Congress meeting or bring excuses etc all with an aim of carrying the strike to next year with a reason best known to them cos
the non-victimisation clause has given them a right to strike without being victimised
and with it they'll have the Gov't in their finger tips. Now their feathers are
cut off and they don't want to call off in disgrace they ask for
due protocols in following the process claiming not to be f**ls
and knowing the system more. If they did knew the system more they would have
remembered to add the non-victimisation clause during the
meeting and not wait until after 3weeks before bringing it as a
condition for suspending the strike, isn't that a new demand! ASUU can use the non-
victimisation clause to fight back even when the 200bn has
been paid, by then FG will have no power over them again.
ASUU lawyers should advice them on how to interpret laws.
ASUU if u like don't call off. Any lecturer that resumes on
Monday will be paid his or her salary arrears. Who don't want
to celebrate Xmas should stay at home cos Fg won't pay
anybody that didn't work.
in fag's voice "fg shld ryt 2 us" fg na ur secetary wei u go dey tell wetin 2 do nd wat nt 2 do? U re nt f**ls y did u nt remember d non victimization clause in d nov 4 meetin due process ma golden foot fag plz tk several seats @ d bak jor
Related Posts
CHIKA KELVIN CHIMEZIE
22nd June, 2026
Niger State Poly announces key appointments for newly created School of Computing & Info. Tech.
CHIKA KELVIN CHIMEZIE
22nd June, 2026
UNIPORT announces 214th Inaugural Lecture
CHIKA KELVIN CHIMEZIE
20th June, 2026
UNIPORT announces upcoming Inaugural Lecture by Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academics
ABDULHAMEED ABDULAZEEZ
19th June, 2026
BOUESTI secures NUC's approval for 33 postgraduate programmes
