The evidence given so far demonstrates that a nuclear exchange in the Northern Hemisphere would have an unavoidable global aftermath making the continued existence of mankind impossible anywhere. It is also very improbable that a nuclear exchange would be confined exclusively to the vicinity of the industrialized developments indicate that a nuclear disaster would be carried into the territories of the developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. These developments include the preparations being made by aggressive forces for the armed seizure of the Middle East oil fields, the nuclear missile deployment in the south of Western Europe, the establishment of military bases for the rapid deployment of forces in North Africa and the Indian Ocean and the tensions in the south Atlantic and the Caribbean.
According to the author, current world development points to
A.
an exclusive destruction of the developing countries
B.
a likely spread of nuclear calamity to the third world countries
C.
nuclear excxhange taking place in africa, asia and latin america
D.
a confrontation between the industrialized and the developing countries
Correct Answer: Option B
Explanation
The passage clearly states that:
A nuclear exchange would have global consequences.
It is very improbable that it would remain limited to industrialised nations.
Developments suggest that a nuclear disaster would be carried into developing regions such as Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
This directly supports the idea of a spread of nuclear disaster to developing countries, not just confinement to one region.
Contributions ({{ comment_count }})
Please wait...
Modal title
Report
Block User
{{ feedback_modal_data.title }}