Mr. Lawal insured his warehouse against burglary but it was later gutted by fire. this implies that?
A.
the loss should be borne by the insurer
B.
Mr. Lawal is liable only for half of the estimated loss
C.
the insurer should make a consolation payment for the loss
D.
the loss should be borne by Mr. Lawal
Correct Answer: Option D
Explanation
No official explanation is available for this question at this time. Please check contributions posted by others below. If you can provide an explanation to help other student learn, please click here
Contributions ({{ comment_count }})
Please wait...
Modal title
Report
Block User
{{ feedback_modal_data.title }}