distribution of organisms
adverse conditions
variation in organisms
inbreeding
Explanation
No explanation available
Video Explanation
No video available
Post your Contribution
Discussions (7)
Darwin's theory of natural selection implies that only the strong ones survive adverse conditions such as limited resources. If there were no adverse conditions, then everyone would survive, there would be no natural selection, no survival of the fittest. Therefore, it can be said that natural selection is a consequence of adverse conditions and B is indeed the correct answer.
Yes.Darwin's theory of natural selection states that:a great number of offspring is produced by the parents into the environment which has limited resources and so there is survival of the fittest where only the strong ones survive adverse conditions such as drought,famine,etc,that is,those that inherited the favourable genes while the rest die off.In this way,nature selects the ones with favourable genes to give rise to better offspring in the future.
After d explanation,cnt bliv u agreed wif option B... Was expecting "it shud 've been C"....anyways nobody z above mistake!
